The case of Samaan Khawam is about far more than the so-called "vandalism" of public space or of a citizen's refusal to be fined by his government. It is clearly about redefining what public space really entails and how the public should be "allowed" to use that space. It's also about the fight for self expression outside of institutionalized means provided by the government.
Honestly now, if you want to draw something on a street in your neighborhood. And the people living on that street have no problem with that. In fact, they encourage that. How can it be okay for some guy in a governmental office building to decide otherwise?
Governments don't want you to visually express yourself in public without their permission. Is the rhetoric of "vandalism" the true motive behind such restrictions or are they afraid of something else?
Read more about Samaan Khawam's case here. And please support him, because this is about a lot more than just him.
Honestly now, if you want to draw something on a street in your neighborhood. And the people living on that street have no problem with that. In fact, they encourage that. How can it be okay for some guy in a governmental office building to decide otherwise?
Governments don't want you to visually express yourself in public without their permission. Is the rhetoric of "vandalism" the true motive behind such restrictions or are they afraid of something else?
Read more about Samaan Khawam's case here. And please support him, because this is about a lot more than just him.



















